"More or Less" a podcast that I like more than is normal
"Welcome to more or less the series that frees numbers from abusive situations and releases them into the community to do good work and lead happy lives" - Tim Harford
"Welcome to more or less the series that frees numbers from abusive situations and releases them into the community to do good work and lead happy lives" - Tim Harford
Posted by
Ed
at
Friday, April 17, 2009
2
comments
Labels: statistics, statistics in the media
Below is a must watch video off YouTube featuring BBC4's Charlie Brooker giving a quick summary of the sometimes strange, mostly bizarre, US news industry. Great video showing all the big hitters on the US news stations, Also featuring Glenn Beck and his very odd demeanour which is VERY VERY VERRRRY like the movie "Network", so much so that I'm pretty sure he will tell us to go to our window and shout I'm as MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE.
(Caution if you are eating or drinking anything during this video you will probably ruin your computer... I warned you)
Posted by
Ed
at
Monday, April 13, 2009
1 comments
Labels: Charlie Brooker, statistics in the media, US media
(Those of you with RSS readers need to click through on the link below)
This is a little presentation I put together after reading an article on the BBC website about statistics in the media, an area that I have unlimited complaints about. I have to admit that this is not a particularly original creation content wise, but I think I have been able to greatly improve the look and feel of the original work.
Have a look and let me know what you think
Posted by
Ed
at
Saturday, April 04, 2009
3
comments
Labels: statistics, statistics in the media
Posted by
Ed
at
Thursday, December 11, 2008
0
comments
Labels: quote, statistics, statistics in the media

I have been thinking about writing a piece on this for quite some time but two events I read about in the news have spurred me on to write it without delay.
People need to realise there is a difference between a absolute number and a percentage. Without being able to put either the absolute, or percentage figure into context they are effectively meaningless.
Take example one. Absolute figure without percentage for context
The Irish agency "FAS" who are involved in training, reskilling and job creation in Ireland, were lambasted in the media for spending circa €600k on "travel and entertainment". Firstly, like it or not, that is the way business is done, building relationships with organisations is an expensive activity, business class flights, fancy restaurants the whole nine yards, as unattractive as that may be its the reality of the situation. SECONDLY, Fas's budget is €1billion. In percentage terms €600k is equal to... wait for it... 0.06% of the overall budget (odd they don't quote that figure in the media)... get over it.
Example 2. Percentage without the absolute for context
Another story that really grinded my gears was the "groundbreaking news" that the UK VAT rate will be reduced by a whopping 2%. The UK media, and seemingly government seem to think that by reducing VAT by 2% this will get people spending in the same reckless way which they used to pre-financial crisis. This is just stupid, and people are obviously not thinking of this in context.
"Plasma screen T.V. - previously £999, now starting from as low as £979"
"Bottle of Champagne - previously £60, now £58.80"
... useless.
Posted by
Ed
at
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
4
comments
Labels: context, statistics, statistics in the media
Now don't get me wrong I am happy that the US election panned out as it did, I was very much an Obama man. However one thing I cant get behind is the general media's attitude that the election of an African American president shows that the US has turned a major corner.
Pundits will often cite the "crushing", "landslide" victory that Obama enjoyed once the votes had been counted, and I suppose the electoral college system in the US goes a long way to make the vote often appear more one-sided that in it should. Obama received 53(ish)% percent of the overall vote, now I dont know how the average person would define a landslide, but for me that just doesn't cut the mustard.
Almost half of the US voting population do not want to see Mr. Obama in the Whitehouse, and these nice folk will be gunning for him (hopefully not in the literal sense, but I wouldn't doubt it) for the entire duration of his time as the "Commander in chief".
Say it all you like but 53% does not a landslide make... thats all I have to say about that
Posted by
Ed
at
Thursday, November 20, 2008
1 comments
Labels: Obama, statistics in the media